View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 31, 2012, 11:55am
bainsey bainsey is offline
Back from the DL
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 2,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
The clear defensive rebound on a missed-the-ring FGA at the buzzer is great.
Agreed. I don't see any point in stopping the game when the defense already has the ball back.

Quote:
Shooting the penalty on the 5th of each quarter is great: games I work hit the penalty less often.
I wouldn't mind NFHS looking into this. Of course, the NCAA would have to switch to 4 tens to make this happen, and with all of those media time-outs anyway, that wouldn't be such a stretch.

Quote:
Advancing the ball to the FC 28' line after a Team A timeout makes for some great dramatic endings.

Having the coaches deal with the table for TOs is great - there's no "timeout! timeout! timeout!" as a player with control just touches out of bounds.

The ignoring of the FT violations is awesome. Less whistles - get the game going again.
I'm dead set against all three of these:
*Why should the offense get the ball at a spot on the floor they haven't earned?
*The live-ball time-out is a big part of the American game. I'd be stunned to see rules committees make changes here.
*If you allow offensive players to violate on free throws, you're going to see a lot more violations when the shot is missed. The point of the enforcement is to discourage violations.

Quote:
The clear path rule - that's great too. You actually have to make an effort to play good defense.
I missed something here. What's this rule?
__________________
Confidence is a vehicle, not a destination.
Reply With Quote