Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
you seem to think that you are entitled to games just because you have reached a certain level.
|
Also, I do think that members or an organization should be treated fairly based on what the organizations leaders have said they would do. There was a system in place to assign games. That system was manipulated so as to "punish" those that the board of directors did not like. That's not being fair -- it's being vindictive.
I still worked plenty of games. I was in a position where I was working a good lower-level college schedule as well as for two different D1 supervisors at the time. That was one of the reasons that I was able to put my name on a lawsuit. It was not a surprise that the leadership manipulated schedules -- that's why the majority of the organization just went along with it ... most are too scared to stick their neck out and put their name on the line, knowing that there will be payback.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
you think that you could remain neutral toward someone you do not care for?
|
As far as my dislike for that person, possibly not. However, I hold the policies of an organization in higher regard than my own personal viewpoints.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7IronRef
you would not take care of the people who supported you over the ones that didn't?
|
It was not the president's place to "take care" of anyone as it relates to scheduling games in an organization with well over 500 members. The president is not in charge of scheduling. However, he used his influence and intimidation with members to get his way ... like a petulant child, rather than dealing with things like a rational adult.