View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 12, 2012, 10:00am
UmpJM UmpJM is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,057
Send a message via Yahoo to UmpJM
Cool

johnny,

mbyron said it was irrelevant to the question of whether R1 could return to 1B or not, because your previous post erroneously implied that R1's right to return to 1B was in someway dependent on whether R2 had been retired or not.

And it's not.

JM
__________________
Finally, be courteous, impartial and firm, and so compel respect from all.
Reply With Quote