[PeteBooth]

Originally posted by gmtomko

H.S. game, 2 outs, runner on 2nd. Ball is popped high on left side of IF, both F5 and F6 are calling for it. Runner is moving in the baseline to third. Just as F6 settles under the ball and catches the ball, outside of the baseline, F5 collides into F6 and the force of that collision causes F6 to collide with R1. The result of that collision is that F6 drops the ball.

I rule interference on R1 and inning is over. Third base coach starts *****ing that it wasn't his runner's fault -- that the fielder initiated the contact -- and, if anything it should be obstruction.

My response was that the intent of R1 is not a factor -- the runner must steer clear of a fielder (or fielders) in the act of making a play.

Comments?

For some strange reason out of all the MAJOR sports, most people think that when there is CONTACT in baseball "Something" has to be called. Baseball is not CONTACT free.

My first question is Did you discuss this play with your partner after the game? Did he /she agree with your call?

On a batted ball, you are correct that INTENT is not a requirement, however, protection doesn't last forever either.

You had a man on second 2 outs so you are probably in position "C". When the ball is popped up you use your best judgement and decide which fielder gets protection.

When the fielder boots the ball UNLESS the ball is in his /her immediate reach or the runner does something deliberate, Protection ends and play on.


In your case the players OWN TEAMMATE is the one who caused F6 to misplay the ball not the action of the runner. If this was a Varsity game, your assignor might be phoning you shortly.

Pete Booth