Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
Please don't put words in my mouth. I wrote:
"If the batter has stepped across the plate and the F2 comes up to throw, I've got BI."
Nothing you say contradicts my statement. Indeed, your requirement that F2 actually throw the ball is incorrect. You don't have to have a throw to have BI.
|
If it sounded like I meant F2 HAS to throw the ball, that is not what I meant at all. I realize that if F2 tries to throw and the batter steps across the plate, you can have INT without a throw.
You said:
Quote:
|
You don't have to wait to judge if there was actual hindrance to the play: the rule has that built in. Call it immediately when you see it.
|
You do have to see if there is hindrance to the play, because like I said, the batter has to alter F2's play since stepping out of the batter's box by itself is not INT.