Thread: More on Batter Interference
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 02, 2012, 12:46am
Matt Matt is offline
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Upper Midwest
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Any published case plays support your interp?
The first one I can think of is for FED. 7.3.5e says if the batter moves after the pitch is caught, he is liable for interference.
__________________
"I don't think I'm very happy. I always fall asleep to the sound of my own screams...and then I always get woken up to the sound of my own screams. Do you think I'm unhappy?"
Reply With Quote