|
From the NFHS case book
Quote:
2.10.1 SITUATION K:
(a) A1; or (b) B1 commits basket interference at Team A's basket. In (a), the referee erroneously counts the score; or in (b), fails to count it. In each case, the error is not discovered until the ball has become live following the dead ball during which the error occurred.
RULING: The official's error in both (a) and (b) is still correctable.
|
It's not the exact situation from the OP but it does show we can correct situations regarding BI. The question is would it be too much of a strtech to think we can correct situations regarding inadvertent GT calls as well.
I'm going to go out on a limb and say we can but I'd also say we shouldn't make a habit of it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toren
I'm thinking in your GT situation, you can also go IW & POI, but don't explain it as a CE because that's not accurate.
|
Toren, why wouldn't CE be accurate. 2-10-1e says "Erroneously counting or canceling a score." That's what this is, isn't it?
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
Last edited by JetMetFan; Wed May 09, 2012 at 03:52pm.
|