Quote:
Originally Posted by tankmjg24
My interpretation of the rule is that either no mitt (who in their right mind would do this) or a catcher's mitt or first baseman's mitt has to be used. The strict reading of the rule says "may" and "mitt". OBR Rule 1.12 states:
The catcher may wear a leather mitt...
|
And that wording is important, given that 1.13 states that a first baseman may wear a glove or mitt......
If the rulesmakers wanted to allow catchers to wear a mitt when they changed the rule in 1965, they would have used appropriate wording.