Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
Apples and orange. One thing has nothing to do with the other.
|
Both are on TV for the contest and performing a service. While their tasks are certainly different, there is some reason to make a comparison. We could also look at what the NCAA head coaches are paid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
How does one arrive at a "fair" amount in a case like this? Why not $20,000?
|
The same way that the players unions in the NFL and NBA determine what is a fair slice of the pie. The problem is that the officials don't have an organized union to negotiate on their behalf. Also one can look at what officials in other notable sporting events are paid--such as the NFL playoffs, NBA playoffs, the Champions League for soccer in Europe. That along with knowledge of the TV revenue should provide good guidance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
How much do the cameramen make? Is it enough?
|
I don't know, but it would be interesting to see and comical if they made more than the guys on the court.
Also, I believe that they have a union who handles this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
The golden rule applies here. Whoever has the gold makes the rules. If the officials in the tournament feel they are underpaid, I imagine there are countless others available who would do it for the same amount or less.
|
Yep, and in the end, you get what you pay for. If the talking heads and coaches wish to complain about the officiating, then part of the solution is higher pay to attract better talent and encourage people to put more time into the task.