Thread: Travel much?
View Single Post
  #48 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 09, 2012, 12:31pm
just another ref just another ref is offline
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by m&m guy View Post
what rule, casebook play, or interp can you cite that allows you to use a/d on *only* these violations? What about the rule that requires b to occupy the 1st spot along the lane during a ft? What possible advantage is there if b isn't there during the first of 2 ft's? Since you consider a/d on the 10-sec. Count on ft's, do you do the same on the 10-sec. Backcourt count? What's the difference?

The reason i'm asking you these questions, and not answering yours, is you seem to be most emphatic about your stance, even in the face of certain case plays that might suggest otherwise. The comment in 9.2.5 sit a seems especially telling: "whether or not there was defensive pressure or whether or not stepping on the court was inadvertent, it is a violation and no judgment is required in making the call." your stance seems to be based on something *not* being mentioned.
+1
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote