Mon Apr 07, 2003, 05:20pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Dave Brost
Had a question regarding the double free throw violation that happened in the second half of the Kansas vs. Marquette game on Saturday. They did not really explain the call that well, but it looked to me like it was a double violation on the front end of a one-and-one? If this was the call, wouldn't the play be dead immediatley, based on the shooting team violating, and you go to the posession-arrow? Or did they say that the defender's act caused the shooter's teammate to violate?
|
There is rarely a "double lane violation" any more.
If two players enter the lane, but not simultaneously (and the refs would "never" see them going in simultaneously), only the first player is penalized.
|
Bob -- Did you see the play? It looked like a lane violation by the shooting team, but he still got both shots. I didn't understand it either.
|
To me, it looked like the third guy up the lane (defense) was first in followed VERY closely by the adjacent offensive player.
|