View Single Post
  #64 (permalink)  
Old Sun Feb 26, 2012, 08:59am
johnnyg08 johnnyg08 is offline
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43 View Post
As I have stated before, you can't apply 6.06c due to the fact that the interference was caused by a retired batter, not a batter, in which 6.06 applies.

From the MLBUM 6.8 Batter Interferes With Catcher, it discusses the various penalties and criteria for disregarding INT via the "initial throw" interp. At the end of this section, it states "If this infraction occurs after the batter is out on strike three, the runner is declared out for batter's interference." There is no "initial throw" interp along with this.
Before you were using 7.09e. Is there a different rule that applies to this OP now? 6.06 applies to interference, I know, but some of us had posted that earlier and you thought it was 7.09e. I'm not trying to be argumentative or prove anything one way or another in my favor, I'm trying to figure out what rule we're using here. Are we sending R3 back to 3rd or not?
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote