View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 02, 2003, 02:12pm
Camron Rust Camron Rust is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally posted by silverfox
During the N.C. State / Marquette round one Men's NCAA game,
a player while making a throw-in from a designated spot,
moved both feet slightly. ( at most, 18 inches )
The official called a violation and gave the travelling
signal which I SAW AS WRONG ON BOTH COUNTS.
The limitation for such a player is that he/she keep one foot on or over the "spot" which extends three feet wide.
This allows the thrower to cover much territory and in fact very few coaches/players take advantage of this situation.
If however, a player does violate this limitation, the travel signal is the wrong one since the travel rule does not exist on a throw-in.
What is the proper mechanic ?
Did anyone else notice this situation ?
It happened one other time in the tournament, but the official used the
"running the baseline" signal.

How successful could a coach be in trying to correct such a
call ?

I saw it and, yes, you are correct in that the official got both the call and the signal wrong. As Jeff said, the signals looks a lot like the 3-seconds mechanic except that you point to the spot and sweep the and away. Unfortunately, this is one of the more commonly mis-called rules, even in the NCAA.

I think it may have even cost NCState the game. It was with 34 seconds to go in a very tight game. To have a bogus turnover like that could certainly be enough to change the outcome.
Reply With Quote