View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 02, 2003, 01:07pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Greene
[. Does the rule book TELL you to determine the path of any ball in flight and then make a decision based on your judgment?



Yes. See the Fed cites in my post.

I'm not arguing the ASA interp. I wouldn't argue with a Fed interp, if one exists. I just propose a logical argument for applying a penalty for detached equipment touching a live bated ball whose status of fair or foul has not been determined.

And, I hope not to have this sitch untill there is an official interp to follow.

Roger Greene [/B][/QUOTE]

Roger,

If a batted ball is in flight near the line when a ball from an adjoining field contacts it, does it make a difference if you thought it might come back fair or do you make your ruling based on the position of the ball when it was contacted by something other than the ground?

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote