Quote:
Originally Posted by Art N
I agree that this is a classic, HTBT.
In light of what has been presented in the OP and others, I would agree that the common foul may be appropriate for this situation then the intentional foul.
However, I just want to make sure we don't get caught up on the issue of how much contact is needed to call a foul, that we disregard some "light" contact that could gain an advantage. We may have harder contact on pick and let it go, and light touch to the shooter's arm we call.
|
Those are bad analogies as contact on a screen is not only expected, it is legal if everyone has done their job. I do not put contact on a screen as the same as contact on a shooter either. And contact on a shooter can be legal as well. It is not about the severity of the contact, is is whether the contact is illegal and affects "normal offensive and defensive movement." If the contact does not do that, then it is not a foul even if it is severe.
Do not cloud the issue with the severity of contact when we know incidental contact does not consider the level as a reason to call or not call a foul.
Peace