Thread: NFHS Test?
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 09, 1999, 09:01am
ken roberts ken roberts is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 83
Post

I also had #42 as true per rule 10.4, penalty note. Illinois has this answer as TRUE.

Currently there's nothing in the Rule Book that says that the 2nd T on an assistant coach is "flagrant", so i say it's False. Apparently, the "flagrant" part used to be in the rules, but was deleted since it's utterly irrelevant to how the rule is applied: he's still ejected.

Interesting in Illinois we were given credit regardless of our answer for # 10,64,69, & 78....As far as # 78 ????

While #78 is straight out of the rule book (6-3-1), i imagine that IL threw out the question cuz too many officials confused "start the alternating procedure" with "getting the arrow first". Again, the semantics are irrelevant to how the rule is applied...
Reply With Quote