Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Your posts tell us that you don't understand the rule.
|
Like I wasn't expecting this. The old canard, you aren't a ref so you can't possibly understand the rules.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
LGP is NOT required to draw a charging foul from an offensive player.
A defender can move sideways and still have LGP.
A defender is allowed to move into the path of the offensive player. He simply needs to get to the spot first and before an airborne shooter leaves the floor.
His feet do not have to be set.
|
I'm sure you're right. But then on the other hand there are instances where a block is the correct call where the defender has not established LGP, where a block is called when a defender moves sideways into the path of the offensive player, where the defender moves into the path of the offensive player and where his feet are not set.
Obviously it depends on the exact circumstances, which is something that granted I have not been able to provide, since I haven't taken the time to record and document these things.
But despite that, I still maintain that calls which in past years were blocks seem to more and more be called charges. And the examples I've mentioned were all cases where IMO, a block would have been called in past years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Other than the placement of tha arc, officiating these types of plays hasn't changed. Officials are not going to get every call right. They didn't last year and they aren't this year. missing one block/charge a game is not unusual, at any level.
|
Certain agree that officials aren't going to get every call right. As to whether the officiating has changed for this particular call, maybe you're right, but that's not been my impression.
Thanks for the response.
Jon