Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
It doesn't.
Play 1) L signals Block, T signals Charge. Ruling: Double Foul
Play 2) L blows whistle, thinks "block". T ... "charge". Ruling: Officials decide.
Play 3) L signals foul on B1, T signals foul on B2. Ruling: Multiple foul (THIS IS THE CASE PLAY AND HASN"T OTHERWISE BEEN DISCUSSED).
Play 4) L blows whistle, thinks "foul on B1." T ... "B2." Ruling: Officials decide which single foul (THIS IS THE CASE THAT GETS DISCUSSED EVERYTIME (ALMOST) ABOUT MULTIPLE FOULS)
Play 5) L blows whistle, sees contact by B1 and B2. Ruling: Official decides which single foul. (THIS IS THE OTHER CASE THAT GETS DISCUSSED ON MULTIPLE FOULS)
|
This is really a stretch. Neither case mentions signals, but if we assume that signal=call and go forward, here is the problem now.
4.19.11 doesn't say
foul or signal. It says if they both foul, here is what you do. Yet everybody, including me, says call one foul. Which means we are ignoring this case play totally. That is perfectly all right, but the other case matters more because?