Quote:
Originally Posted by KCRC
I've seen multiple posts with this same theme/response. Can someone quote me a rule that supports this philosophy?
In 1, I would say that possession is a factor in judging advantage/disadvantage, but not necessarily determinitive.
In 2, I understand this might be good game management, but what rule says that past actions in the game, or potential future actions in the game, are factors in whether contact on a given play is incidental or illegal?
Thanks all,
|
Credit to Snaqwells post 13:
4-27-3 should be taken into account:
"Contact which does not hinder the opponent from participating in normal defensive or offensive movements should be considered incidental."
If the player in question secures the rebound, and contact by the opponent didn't fold him in half, (clean up rough play) how was he hindered?