View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:35pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy View Post
Mike - I guess you are pretty serious about this...

When you first put it on the other forum, I couldn't tell if you were serious or just "stirring the pot" a bit....

(I suppose if you were just "stirring the pot", you would have put it on HeyBucket! )
I'm not serious to the point of a major change is coming, but I am surprised (not your home town) at the lack of vision. Not that they disagree so much, that's fine, but the "don't have to consider it, I'm against it" manner.

As I had stated, was not the reason the PP went to 43' to adjust for the skills of the pitcher and the effect they had on the overall game? Was not the reason the fences were moved back because of the effect the equipment and skills had on the game? Just curious as to why those "had to happen", but moving the bases in FP is so easily dismissed.

What do you think is going to happen when someone tries to push the 52/300 into the FP game?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote