Quote:
Originally posted by just another ref
On the subject, I see in the local paper that the folks in Ruston (LA Tech) were somewhat miffed by their #5 seed. This is not my area of expertise, but doing the math:
#6(?) ranking in the country, #5 ranking in the region, there seems to be a bit of a crack. Somebody knowledgeable have an opinion?
|
This might not be the answer you are looking for, but National Rankings have nothing to do with the committee decisions in theory. So maybe their RPI was rather low and other teams showed a better schedule performed more to the committee's standards?
Peace