|
Poke in the eye
I saw the play, including the replays. Didn't agree that it was an obvious foul. The poke in the eye was not where the foul occurred, IMHO. I thought, if anything, they should have got him for jumping on top of the guy. One guy's laying on the floor reaching for the ball, the other guy dives but lands on top of the first guy (I thought). It wasn't an obvious call, and could have gone either way (call or no-call.)
Adam
|