Fri Mar 14, 2003, 12:59pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 292
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Snaqwells
Quote:
Originally posted by MN 3 Sport Ref
If we let team A put the ball in play we are using resuming play procedures 7.5.1. If we imm. whack during a FT we are not 8.1.1. So how can we use RPP on one sitch and not the other. That is what we are hammering at here is this an extension of RPP or not....
|
Okay, here's my rationale.
Situation A. B1 fouls out on a PC foul. No shots, ball OOB for A. Coach immediately sends B6 to the table to replace B1, then summons his kids for a huddle. Players still on the floor, coach just thinks he still gets to use the 30 seconds. I'd give him a quick warning, "Coach, let's go." Wait a couple seconds. If no movement. Blow the whistle and hand the ball to A1.
Players are on the court, so RPP isn't necessary, IMO. If anything, T the coach for being on the court (if he is) or standing (if there's a seatbelt in effect). I wouldn't take it that far, since it would only aggravate the situation. If he howls, tell him we can discuss it later if he wishes.
Situation B. Same as above, but B1 fouls out on a shooting foul. A1 gets free throws.
Line up for the free throws, and give the ball to A1. If B isn't in position, I've got a T.
Adam [/B]
|
Look at what I just said above. You are using RPP on one sitch (baseline throw-in) and not the other (FT) you can't have it both ways. Here is the way I look at it. Although this is not calssified as a timeout, it is a stoppage of play with a timed replacement period. Does this fall under RPP or not. You say no since the sub has reported and all five players are on the court. Why then would you have a T for not occupying the low blocks and not a delayed violation as you would normally have???
|