Quote:
Originally Posted by ozzy6900
I have a serious problem with holding "board meetings" about plays at the plate. Call me "old school" but I am right there, among the offense and defense and in the correct position. So why do I want to involve my partner who can be anywhere from 90'+ away? Just to please a coach? If he does not like my decision, then he can leave. I do not believe in "joint decisions". Yes, yes..... I know that this is not the thinking of the 21st Century but like I said, I am old school. No one can convince me that a person 90'+ away has a better view than I (if I am where we are supposed to be).
Just a thought.
|
I can see the use of a "board meeting" at the plate to determine the facts. We had a situation like this with the Seattle Mariners this year. After a collision at the plate, PU apparently thought the catcher dropped the ball, and called the runner safe. DM argues, an umpire conference is held, and it is determined that factually, the catcher did not drop the ball. PU corrects himself, declares the runner out. As I understand MLB, this was proper (and actually got the call right.)
In the OP, though, the defense was arguing a case of judgment on intent. I'm not sure if my organization agrees (Little League is getting a little "board meeting" happy), but I can't imagine that I'd ever go to another umpire to determine the
intent of the players right in front of me.