View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 11, 2003, 06:32pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,506
Quote:
Originally posted by Blackhawk357

In your example Rutt, the trhow-in is over when A2 recieves the ball. Thus the succeeding throw-in is a spot throw-in. Not the same thing. I stand with the Z-man.

Blackhawk
It is not about who you stand by or who you do not. I just wanted to illustrate that you can have a foul or violation take place that will take the ball back to the baseline. In the case I described, you cannot retain that previledge. There are people that think regardless of whether a throw-in takes place or not, they can retain this right. Also part of the problem is that this play in not directly illustrated in the Casebook and it does not make it clear when that previledge ends. But I can assume that the NF did not intend for that to be the case. Especially with the case plays they gave in describing this new change that was last year.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote