|
Can we all agree that although I object to the term of the title, this might be what it was derived for?
I think all of us, including the OP, know that correct protocol is necessary and that there is no other way out of a situation where someone continues to object to the ruling.
I also agree to most of the post that brought out the applause.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|