Heard this story before, maybe from the PU
.
Then and now, no INT, because the batter is only required to vacate the "congested" area and apparently did and did not hinder a play. In fact, it looks like she actually slowed the ball down, making it closer for the catcher.
The catcher not finding the ball seems irrelvant to the INT question.
If you really want a rule cite, I'll try to figure out which nodule of my brain I used.
