View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Tue Mar 11, 2003, 03:32pm
Tim C Tim C is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,729
Will & Wool

Will:

So Alabama has ruled contrary to FED -- is that what you are saying?

If that is true that means that Mr. Brewer is supporting a ruling that is NOT FED sanctioned and therefore he is not allowed to be on the National Rules Committee.

We have been told over-and-over that any state that does not follow FED rules cannot be involved in the development of the rule book.

Does Mr. Brewer KNOW what ruling is being used in HIS state?

Wool: just give me a FED citation that backs your description of a "legal lead" . . . after 34 years I have yet to find that citation, but even this old dog can learn new things.

Tee

[Edited by Tim C on Mar 11th, 2003 at 02:35 PM]
Reply With Quote