Thu Sep 15, 2011, 09:41am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canned Heat
Posed two scenarios to our head football guy in WI at the WIAA....my question followed by his response.
If the center (A55) snapped the ball back and it went; a) went straight back along the ground, loose bouncing back to the QB (A12) without getting airborne at all.
Or
b) backward from LOS but still under the center, without being touched by any other A player.
The snap ends when the ball hits the ground and it becomes a loose ball. Since the snap from the center touched the ground, the snap ended and it is a fumble. If recovered by the offense they may continue the play. It would be a loose ball. Team A could recover the loose ball and advance, as could B.
If the snapper were to fail to release the ball, you'd have an illegal snap. But if he immediately releases the ball and it is loose, I would keep the ball live. So in both (a) and (b) scenarios presented below, live ball.
|
Wow. Heck... I'm in agreement with this being a live, legal snap... but honestly that reply is weak. Wouldn't you agree?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”
West Houston Mike
|