So you have inside knowledge of MLB?
To bad you cant understand simple, or I should say refuse to accept simple concepts. You really want to continue to believe that MLB would have their people simply ignore part of a play they are reviewing then go ahead. I choose to believe that they handled this particular play within their rules and correctly.
And I see that you ignore the fact that the article stated that the league contended that the ruling was correct. I suppose the paper was lying along with West.