View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 03, 2011, 04:10pm
AtlUmpSteve AtlUmpSteve is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tex View Post
Then why is there a rule 8.6.18, if the "Blocked Ball" theory can be used?
They are both possible calls, depending on a judgment if a play was possible. If a play is possible, as judged by the umpire, 8-6-18 (NFHS) and 8.7-P (ASA) describe the ruling. If the umpire judges no play (thus no interference), then you shouldn't let the situation continue and develop to where a later play might be possible.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote