View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 30, 2011, 07:04am
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Nah, not being sneaky. Yes, catcher was in foul territory, so it was not a trick question.
Maybe because it seemed too easy.

Quote:
Someone asked me the question, I answered with the call I said above. The only thing I left out was the ball dribbled back out into fair territory & runners were advancing (one would have probably scored). The umpire did kill the ball, sent the runners back, placed the batter on 1B, but then had second thoughts since killing the ball deprived the team of a run.
"He" didn't kill the ball, the catcher did by obstructing and then touching the ball over foul territory. It was a foul ball, so no runners would advance had the obstruction not occurred.

Steve already covered the appropriate call and prescribed award.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote