Quote:
Originally Posted by amusedofficial
This leap of faith with respect to my thoughts on the subject makes assumptions not in evidence in my comments.
Rules tests are based on the application of rules to particular circumstances. I am told that most of the questions are based on situations that actually happened.
Having someone design some sort of shuttle test and "pick a number" is to require a test that, unlike the rules test, is not based on empirical research into actual situations, but, rather, which is based on a purely speculative concept of proper conditioning.
Evaluate the officials on what they do on the court, and leave off-the-field speculative testing to the NFL combine.
|
Except even with the rules test, you're still "picking a number" to determine who's eligible to work what level. Who's to say that someone that scores a 70 has sufficient rules knowledge to work a game? Why not bump it up to 80 or 90+ since as officials, we should know the rules inside and out?
You're point about some of the rules questions actually having happen or do happen in games is true, but a physical test could test many of the same movements that are required in a game...short sprints, quick stop and go movements, etc...and yes you'd have to pick a cut off...usually this cut off is going to be based on some research I feel.