Quote:
Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer
Most people already take at least a rules test to determine if they are eligible to officiate, and/or to decide what levels they are eligible to work. With the line of thinking in your post above, I'm assuming you have a problem with that also? Literally everything you have against a physical test could be applied to any test(s) you already have to take.
|
This leap of faith with respect to my thoughts on the subject makes assumptions not in evidence in my comments.
Rules tests are based on the application of rules to particular circumstances. I am told that most of the questions are based on situations that actually happened.
Having someone design some sort of shuttle test and "pick a number" is to require a test that, unlike the rules test, is not based on empirical research into actual situations, but, rather, which is based on a purely speculative concept of proper conditioning.
Evaluate the officials on what they do on the court, and leave off-the-field speculative testing to the NFL combine.