Quote:
Originally posted by jking_94577
"THis all remains true even if it were discovered before B1's replacement for his 5th foul."
This is not a correct statement then because B1 instead of B1's replacement would be shooting had this happened before the 5th foul.
|
It is a correct statement. The original situation stated that the refs noticed the error after the "replacement" had come in. Camron points out that this part is irrelevant. Even if the replacement has not yet come in when the error is noticed, the 5th foul has still occurred, and the sub must shoot.
Adam