Quote:
Originally Posted by hoopguy
mbyron - I am not sure if I am disagreeing with Cameron, but I am expanding on his point. There is a wide discrepancy on the advantage/disadvantage philosophy and I am in the camp where I try to be aware of what is okay and not okay and I lean toward calling fouls instead of the 'playing through' but all situations are HTBT. I have seen others and myself as well allow contact and 'play through' situations where I later regretted not calling a foul. This has gone both ways too where I called fouls I should have let go but the consequences of not calling the foul are normally more severe than the consequences of calling the foul when this mistake is made.
The point I am trying to make is that too often refs do not make calls that should be made using the excuse of advantage/disadvantage.
|
It's part of the learning process, but "advantage/disadvantage" is all but written into the rules in the definition of a foul.
Learning which contact is a foul, and which contact is incidental is part of learning how to officiate.
When A1 gets slapped on the arm as he blows by B1, and he's about to get an easy layup anyway, there's no foul.
A much lighter slap on the arm would be a foul, however, if it occurred during the shooting motion and actually affected the shot.