Quote:
Originally Posted by tcarilli
That's one take. Another take is that plays like this 3-2 pitch R1 running on the pitch, create potential issues. It does not seem right in this situation to allow the player who started as the batter to do something that would cause him to be out for interference on any other count and have that action allow R1 to advance to third.
|
What you are perceiving as "not seeming right" is causing you to overanalyze and make this even more complex than it should be. For one thing, who ever said the batter
did something that required an out be declared?
I'll leave you with this quote from one of our instructors at umpire school, a quote I still remember 22 1/2 years later:
Quote:
|
Don't trouble trouble, because trouble will have no trouble troubling you.
|