Quote:
Originally posted by kellerumps
IrishMafia,
I understand that you are frustrated with this argument since both sides can not see eye to eye. I am really trying to see your side of things therefor, I am looking for anything in the ASA rulebook that supports your argument.
As of right now, I can not find anything in the 2002 ASA Rule book to support your argument. Please give me something....I want to understand your point of view from the ASA side of things.
|
Look at it this way. Where in the book does it say interference is ever ignored?
Even a protected runner is not exempt from being ruled out for interference, so why would anyone think that a runner not protected would be exempt?
It's a bit like trying to prove a negative.