View Single Post
  #73 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 16, 2011, 02:52pm
tcarilli tcarilli is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by UMP25 View Post
I

You are referencing the wrong rule. The player is no longer a batter; therefore, any interference must be INtentional. It wasn't. Consequently, it was an incorrect call and incorrect ruling.
So, which rule applies here?
__________________
Tony Carilli
Reply With Quote