|
"I believe there is something somewhere that says interference supercedes obstruction."
Please tell me where it says that because I can not find it. Please use the 2002 rulebook.
My whole point is that the defense started this fiasco when the catcher obstructed. Without that one act, we may have had a basehit. In essence you are rewarding the defense with an "Out" because the catcher did something that altered the play from the beginning. I don't see how you can reward the defense. Now please understand I am not talking about malicious contact. I am talking about your garden variety interference call.
I have spoken with my State UIC and he is as clueless as the rest of us. All I want is something concrete in the ASA rulebook.
__________________
We Don't Look for Problems.....They find Us.
|