Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
What do you base this assertion on? Yes, if there was a misapplied ruling, they should and WOULD fix it. The fact that they didn't is evidence that it was not a misapplied ruling. Maybe you, or I, or 90% of the umpires here wouldn't have called interference on the BR - but this PU did.
|
So just because all 4 guys uphold an incorrect ruling that ruling must have been correct? Yeah, that makes sense.
Quote:
|
And when PU said, "I judged interference on the BR", what exactly would you be basing your protest on?
|
On the fact that there couldn't be interference on this play because the catcher could not have been making a play to retire a runner if said runner could not have been liable to have been put out; he had the base free and clear due to the walk.