Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
You only kill the ball if, for some reason, the catcher proceeds to tag the runner - most of the time, this doesn't happen.
There's a lot more to this play that changes if you rule she didn't touch home and was obstructed. Consider the case where the throw doesn't beat her ... she's heading to the dugout, thinking she's safe. Play may proceed - and she might even make it completely to the dugout. You may have signalled obstruction and said it aloud. Are you going to make a point of pulling the player out of the dugout to touch home? How do you go about announcing your award without making it obvious you don't have her touching the plate.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoTafurst
Some 1st basemen aren't taught properly or are slow to learn..
 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoTafurst
Unless you saw some part of her foot touch the plate  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
No, I'll only kill the ball if she's tagged out. If she's safe, I call safe.
It's no different than any other missed base. If she doesn't go back to touch the plate, she's subject to appeal. If she enters the dugout without touching the plate, that's on her coaches.
|
It is now truly a matter of semantics........in the OP, if the runner stepped on the foot of the catcher who had it on home plate......the runner
touched the plate.
Have you all not been taught that any part of the ball that hits the black portion of the plate also hit the white. Same reasoning........
Argue obstruction, etal. all you want.....the runner was safe as soon as she crossed the plate. By my instructions (wished I knew where the notes were), stomping on the foot of F2 as she crossed is as good as touching. Now if you want to hijack the thread and talk about obstruction and missing the plate.....go ahead.
Joel