Quote:
Originally Posted by tref
True story BNR!
A mere touch of the throw-in pass does not constitute player possession although t/c exists...
|
But PC is not required, per se, for a BC violation. Currently (previously, actually), it's only required because it's needed for TC to exist. The rule change essentially means PC is no longer required for TC.
The rules will have to be re-worded to keep the BC rule the same.
My guess, they won't be, but a case play will be written that references a non-existent requirement (PC) in order to claim it's not a violation.