Quote:
Originally posted by oppool
From the ASA test R1 on 3B when B2 hits a fly ball to F7. Thinking the ball will be caught, B2 throws his bat in anger. The ball bounds off F7 and clears the fence. The umpire should:
a. rule a dead ball, call B2 out and eject him and return R1 to 3B
B. Keep the ball alive, scoring R1 and B2 and then eject B2 for unsportmanlike conduct.
C. Rule a dead ball, eject B2 and allow R1 to score
D. Rule a dead ball, allow R1 to score since he had crossed the plate prior to the unsportmanlike act and place B2 on 1B
The correct answer per the key to the test and in the case book under rule 10 is A.
My BEEF is there is no where in the rule that I can find that says you should call a batter out for throwing a bat in anger unless throwing the bat caused interference on the play and on this play there is no way that it could interfer with the left fielder chance to catch a ball. ASA even has a POE for throwing the bat which no where under that POE does it state that a batter should be called out and a DEAD BALL ruled for throwing a bat. Dont have a problem with the ruling if it is stated in the rule book BUT when ASA assumes situation such as this and then basically put it up to the umpire to call with no writting to enforce ASA is doing an injustice to the umps. I am not just ragging ASA here I am sure all the affiliations have common problems but I dont call them so I am not aware of them. It is very simple if this is they way they want enforce put it the rule book and not just the CASE BOOK for coaches and all to see
off rant
Don
|
Just off the phone with a member of the NUS. The ruling is correct.
I noted that even though each reference cited has it's own merits, there is no links actually connecting them to facilitate the ruling offered.
The ommission was acknowledge, yet I was instructed to support the ruling and I would receive the same from the NUS should a protest arise.
This applies to any time a run scores and there is an act of unsportsmanlike conduct on the part of the offense.
Handle it the same as you would an interference call except that no runs are allowed to score on the play.
Hope this helps everyone. I believe we will see a change in wording next year.
Thanks,