Wed Jun 01, 2011, 04:58pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
This is exactly what I thought when I read "he didn't think it was violent enough". Just didn't get here fast enough.
There are obviously non-flagrant fouls that can be committed with the leg (accidental trip, blocking, etc.), but in a situation where a player intentional extends the leg to strike an opponent. . . he gone!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Edit:
I missed this part, and now I'm picturing the play differently.
Flagrant personal.
The observer is still full of crap for suggesting an unsporting T for a contact foul.
|
Great...I was beginning to wonder why no other posters were seeing it as flagrant.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott
"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
|