Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
This is exactly what I thought when I read "he didn't think it was violent enough". Just didn't get here fast enough.
There are obviously non-flagrant fouls that can be committed with the leg (accidental trip, blocking, etc.), but in a situation where a player intentional extends the leg to strike an opponent. . . he gone!
|
Let me ask this, because I think I'm envisioning this play differently.
Would it be different if the player attempted to trip his opponent as opposed to an attempt to kick his opponent?
Edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCHSAA
Contact was made on the torso/lower side of A1.
|
I missed this part, and now I'm picturing the play differently.
Flagrant personal.
The observer is still full of crap for suggesting an unsporting T for a contact foul.