Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
Unfortunately your reading comprehesion is lacking. Snaq's was suggesting a change in the defintion of an airborne shooter and I was agreeing with his suggestion. So subtract at least 2 from your several.
R.I.F. -- applies here just as much here as it does with the rule book.
|
I understood that Snaq's was suggesting a rule change. I did not understand that you were as well. Your post didn't include the words "could" or "should" which was misleading to me.
So I'll subtract 1 from the count.