Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder
Um .... WHAT interference? I thought there was a memo even taht this was a typo. The Effect should be for E-H (as E through H all deal with interference.) D does not.
|
I know everybody here seems to think this rule is wrong. But it does match the NFHS rule. 8-2-4 and there it clearly isn't just an editorial mistake. (Don't have my casebook, but I think there is a case play as well.)