Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I think that what I think doesn't matter. The NFHS explicitly stated that it was a freaking clarification of an existing rule. I know that because I posted a FED document that states that. Whether the FED is consistent with the term or not is completely irrelevant. It just is what it is. And what it is is not worth Randalizing imo. The play was always called that way afaik anyway.
Y'all carry on though. I'm going to tend to my petunias.
|
I'll agree that the rule was always supposed to be the same as it is now, so calling the change a clarification makes sense.
But the NFHS calling it a clarification doesn't make it so; reference the 9-1-3g. They called that a clarification, but it was a rule change plain and simple.