Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
My opinion is that it was a rule changed advertised as a clarification. They clarified their intent by changing the wording of the rule which changed the rule itself. I recognize that others disagree, and I differ from Scrappy only in that I think there was some ambiguity in the rule before. It was, at least, open for interpretation.
Sort of like the clarification of the backcourt exception limiting it to three situations rather than any situation which does not involve active Team Control.
|
My opinion is that it is exactly what it says it is...and no amount of
Randalizing is gonna change that. The rule did
NOT change.
The Fed stated that it was a
clarification of an existing rule, just the same as case plays are. Clarifications are
NOT rules changes.